Re^2: Open source code and copyright

> But again, seek professional advice.

The commercial volume is too small to pay off legal advice. The payment is not my motivation.

They already have loads of content in other languages and I think Perl should be presented too.

> or that they can have it with but in the latter case it will cost them substantially more because you will not be able to base it upon the works of others.

That's already my approach, just wanted to learn more about licences.

From another perspective:

If I were a modules author I would not object to the reuse of code in the tutorial section.

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)

Wikisyntax for the Monastery
FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice}

Comment on Re^2: Open source code and copyright

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Open source code and copyright by hippo (Archbishop) on Nov 15, 2019 at 14:59 UTC
If I were a modules author I would not object to the reuse of code in the tutorial section. Nor would I. However, I would strongly object to someone else claiming copyright of that code.	[reply]
Re^4: Open source code and copyright by LanX (Saint) on Nov 15, 2019 at 15:04 UTC
I agree, the copyright could only cover the alterations and annotations in an educational context. IOW another e-learning provider could not reuse this work. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice}	[reply]