Re^4: Inclusion of Raku on PerlMonks

OTOH, what liz thinks doesn't really carry much weight around here. (No disrespect intended.) On the one hand, it's been a long time since she contributed much here (other than participating in threads on the present topic); on the other hand, she has taken her marbles and gone home (as the saying goes); and on the third hand, no one person's opinion carries that much weight around here. In short, liz's statement should not be treated as a "mic drop" by the rest of us. Carry on.

I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.

Comment on Re^4: Inclusion of Raku on PerlMonks

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Inclusion of Raku on PerlMonks by LanX (Saint) on Nov 15, 2019 at 18:05 UTC
I was always very clear that I like seeing Perl6 code discussed here. My reply was intended at HaukeX' quote in the OP > Sites such as PerlMonks appear to be really Perl (aka Perl 5) focused, and could possible make that clear in their description, or change their description to specifically include Raku. well... Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice}	[reply]
Re^6: Inclusion of Raku on PerlMonks by jdporter (Paladin) on Nov 15, 2019 at 19:07 UTC
He barks up trees that never felt a wound.	[reply]
Re^7: Inclusion of Raku on PerlMonks by jdporter (Paladin) on Nov 18, 2019 at 16:05 UTC
Which was my snarky way of saying, yet again, that it isn't a problem until it's a problem. Some people seem to be apprehensive about a flood of Raku programmers coming to PerlMonks with their questions/discussions. If that happens, we can deal with it then. The likelihood seems remote to me. Let's focus our energies on the problems we do have, rather than on the problems we imagine we might one day have. I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.	[reply]