in reply to Re^2: Interpreting Assembly
in thread Interpreting Assembly

> Strangely I wasn't able to find anything yet at all

Because it is a WTF idea? ;)

If your sole intention is obfuscation, try giving XS or Inline::C a chance.

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Interpreting Assembly
by misc (Friar) on Dec 01, 2019 at 22:29 UTC
    > Because it is a WTF idea? ;)

    :) yeah I know, sometimes I'm having strange ideas..

    However, as you write .. "You'd need to transform the ASM syntax a little to make it valid Perl code."

    There might exist something out there doing exactly this.

    Inline C, I don't like the idea of having external dependencies at run (compile) time.

    Much to many attack vectors.

    And there's also the point, there are really bad things possible within perl.

    e.g. The tie()s That Bind,
    meaning to store a var within x will not necessarily store the variable within x..

    so, the control flow can be fuzzed with, in really hard to predict ways.

    .. I'm thinking just now about parallelization..
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom