Re^4: Qt5 and perl

Just started with working with Perl Tk. I think there is interests in this subject, especially to overcome the impression that, Perl is not vibrant and state of the art or leading edge. I disagree with this view, but the argument is made by younger users, which don’t use Perl or don’t even want to spend the time to lern it. The feel much more then the look is determined by the GUI.

Comment on Re^4: Qt5 and perl

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Qt5 and perl - duddle on perl vs python? by ptizoom (Scribe) on Dec 30, 2019 at 08:17 UTC
yes, perl5 is too heavy on structure and magic symbols, but I am pretty sure in the long term .... noooop... perl5 won't have a nice future, only feeding CPAN will spare it longer ..it has not a good "objects" hineritance way of coding and debugging...$! I think long lasting interrests (since the 80ies, the 16 bit processor) are on reaching 4rth generation languages by training algos to bridge together those 3rd generations languages, one not better than the others! this is why I am looking to understand this perl+Qt5 stuff, based on "smoke" by chrisburel...	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^5: Qt5 and perl - duddle on perl vs python?
by ptizoom (Scribe) on Dec 30, 2019 at 08:17 UTC

perl5 won't have a nice future, only feeding CPAN will spare it longer ..it has not a good "objects" hineritance way of coding and debugging...$!

chrisburel

[reply]