Re^4: RFC: "assignary" operator ?= :

Personally I feel this just obfuscates the problem at hand, but I dislike/hate statement-modifiers in general.

$var1 and die "ERROR: ...";
$var1 = $var2;
[download]

To **me** is extremely better readable (and thus maintanable) than your suggestion. TIMTOWTDI.

Enjoy, Have FUN! H.Merijn

Comment on Re^4: RFC: "assignary" operator ?= : Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: RFC: "assignary" operator ?= : by ikegami (Patriarch) on Dec 07, 2019 at 19:08 UTC
Personally, I despise people that hide `die` and other flow control statements. (Put a line break before the `and` and a blank line after `die`!) Either way. The point is the separation of the two actions.	[reply] [d/l] [select]

In Section Meditations