in reply to Re^5: RFC: "assignary" operator ?= :
in thread RFC: "assignary" operator ?= :

So, it looks like there are plenty of use cases ;)

Iff you dont need backwards compatibility

  • Comment on Re^6: RFC: "assignary" operator ?= : (compatibility)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: RFC: "assignary" operator ?= : (compatibility)
by tobyink (Canon) on Dec 09, 2019 at 13:49 UTC

    True. One of my modules is on that list, but I wouldn't use this operator because it needs to support Perl 5.6.1.

    toby döt ink
[reply]

In Section Meditations