in reply to Re^3: Displaying bit-vectors with Most Significant Bits to the left?
in thread Displaying bit-vectors with Most Significant Bits to the left?

> So what?

Well, you've pretended to show tested code.

Think about it.

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice

  • Comment on Re^4: Displaying bit-vectors with Most Significant Bits to the left?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Displaying bit-vectors with Most Significant Bits to the left?
by shmem (Chancellor) on Jan 05, 2020 at 17:28 UTC

    Well, you faked a copy from an actual test.

    Think about it.

    What should I think?it mimicked the REPL you are using. I did even fake the sequence number! D'oh!
    Mine is different, I use perlsh from Term::ReadLine::Gnu (hacked to suit my needs), and this was the actual test using it: 

    package main; # [498] ~ > vec($m0,$_,1)=1 for 0,2,8,9,10

result:
''
package main; # [499] ~ > scalar reverse unpack 'b16',$m0

result:
'0000011100000101'

    [download]

    So not only am I a fool, but a dishonest person also, a liar and a faker, whose code is not to be trusted. At all!

    update: No Sir, I did not pretend to show tested code, as you claim after having edited your answer (without note). I did, and you can beat me to death for that, forget the scalar. Next.

    perl -le'print map{pack c,($-++?1:13)+ord}split//,ESEL'
[reply]
[d/l]
[select]
      ... this was the actual test ...

      So why not post the actual test and its result in the first place? Confusion and wasteful discussion | quarreling could have been avoided.

      Give a man a fish:  <%-{-{-{-<

[reply]
[d/l]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom