in reply to Re: Development of PerlMonks "Mobile" is now open for business
in thread Development of PerlMonks "Mobile" is now open for business

IMHO should something like this be our approach

I don't disagree. But I have nowhere near the chops to implement it myself. Other expertise will have to step up and help. :-)

I would have preferred to have this discussion in a less public board, alas there is no alternative.

You can start a thread on the pmdev page. That has all the confidentiality we need, I think.

I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.
  • Comment on Re^2: Development of PerlMonks "Mobile" is now open for business

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Development of PerlMonks "Mobile" is now open for business
by LanX (Saint) on Feb 15, 2020 at 19:54 UTC
    > You can start a thread on the pmdev page.

    Unfortunately we are turning in circles...

    ... pmdev threads quickly become unreadable.

    I.E. without RAT support and/or messages.

    > > IMHO should something like this be our approach

    > I don't disagree.

    I'll create a showcase.

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
    Wikisyntax for the Monastery

      without RAT support

      Patches welcome. :-)

      and/or messages

      Notification on reply seems to work for me...

      I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.
        How can I patch pmdevtopic? ;-)

        Authorized Readers: default(all) <--- Authorized Creators: cabal(usergroup) Authorized Updaters: default(owner) Authorized Deleters: gods(usergroup)

        honestly I don't think the concept to list all threads in pmdev is sustainable.

        Why can't we create a new nodetype which is included in RAT but only displays for pmdev (or similar)?

        Cheers Rolf
        (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
        Wikisyntax for the Monastery