Re: Janitation History vs. Poster History

Hi Ken,

I think it has been discussed many times before.

And I remember a time where even janitation history was not available to that extent.

Anyway I think we have more urgent problems atm than a complete edit history.

Though a "last edited" timestamp would certainly help in many cases.

This should be comparatively easy with a quick return of investment.

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)

Wikisyntax for the Monastery}

Comment on Re: Janitation History vs. Poster History

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Janitation History vs. Poster History by kcott (Archbishop) on Mar 08, 2020 at 06:43 UTC
G'day Rolf, Thanks for your response. I certainly wasn't trying to imply that there was any urgency for this. It's not something I'm desperate for; I just thought it would be a nice feature to have. Your 'a "last edited" timestamp' suggestion sounds like a good idea. Presumably, if there's no Janitation History, or the Janitation History shows a different timestamp, then edits must have been done by the OP. — Ken	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^2: Janitation History vs. Poster History
by kcott (Archbishop) on Mar 08, 2020 at 06:43 UTC

G'day Rolf,

Thanks for your response.

I certainly wasn't trying to imply that there was any urgency for this. It's not something I'm desperate for; I just thought it would be a nice feature to have.

Your 'a "last edited" timestamp' suggestion sounds like a good idea. Presumably, if there's no Janitation History, or the Janitation History shows a different timestamp, then edits must have been done by the OP.

— Ken

[reply]