in reply to Re: declaring lexical variables in shortest scope: performance?
in thread declaring lexical variables in shortest scope: performance?

Maybe it is negligible but that is Benchmark pitfall, overhead drowns out what you're measuring, in line sub contents as strings not sub calls
  • Comment on Re^2: declaring lexical variables in shortest scope: performance?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: declaring lexical variables in shortest scope: performance?
by haukex (Archbishop) on Mar 31, 2020 at 12:08 UTC
    overhead drowns out what you're measuring, in line sub contents as strings not sub calls

    Can you show the code that demonstrates this?