Re^2: perldoc of s///ee wrong or just misleading?

> If hypothetically $& was assignable to, then the following are roughly equivalent:

maybe better

  s/PAT/STR/     <=>  m/PAT/ && $& = "STR";
  s/PAT/CODE/e   <=>  m/PAT/ && $& = do {CODE};
  s/PAT/CODE/ee  <=>  m/PAT/ && $& = eval do {CODE};
  s/PAT/CODE/eee <=>  m/PAT/ && $& = eval eval do {CODE};
  ... and so on
[download]

Cheers Rolf

_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)}

Comment on Re^2: perldoc of s///ee wrong or just misleading? Download Code