Re^4: first steps with Mojolicious::Lite -- under

thanks shmem really appreciated,

> what happens if get_second gets called first?

I suppose my application will reject the request because the cookie was not set; is my mojo DWIM? But this is not importatnt at the moment.

I still miss the meaning of this sugar called under and I read about it. I cant capacitate how your example can be similar to others in this thread where syntax like my $foo = $r->under('/foo')->to('foo#baz'); are presented like in the docs.

How other examples in this thread can use under in a total different way?

With your comment with the following, all following routes require a logged-in user and a proper cookie you mean that if some route is positioned in the file after an under one, this is executed? Like as it was a pragma no strict usage?

Sincerily I found this option highly unreadable: or, as you have done, you put a BIG comment stating it clear, or after 100 lines everyone forget the under is in use. I see you can group routes using under and sounds saner... but I miss the sense of the code presented in the example.. ( the route is /admin/dashboard or /dashboard ??)

Anyway thanks a lot to you and to all others contributors of this thread

There are no rules, there are no thumbs..
Reinvent the wheel, then learn The Wheel; may be one day you reinvent one of THE WHEELS.

Comment on Re^4: first steps with Mojolicious::Lite -- under Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: first steps with Mojolicious::Lite -- under by shmem (Chancellor) on Jun 16, 2020 at 12:31 UTC
Once the under() sub is compiled, all following get() and post() etc calls get compiled as calling this under() sub first. So `under sub { validate_cookie() }; get "/foo" => sub { my $c = shift; ... }; get "/bar" => sub { my $c = shift; ... };` [download] is equivalent to `get "/foo" => sub { validate_cookie() or return; my $c = shift; ... }; get "/bar" => sub { validate_cookie() or return; my $c = shift; ... };` [download] perl -le'print map{pack c,($-++?1:13)+ord}split//,ESEL'	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: first steps with Mojolicious::Lite -- under by haukex (Archbishop) on Jun 16, 2020 at 11:38 UTC
I cant capacitate how your example can be similar to others in this thread where syntax like `my $foo = $r->under('/foo')->to('foo#baz');` are presented like in the docs. That code looks more like it comes from a regular Mojolicious application rather than a Mojolicious::Lite application - see Mojolicious::Guides::Growing for the link between the two. Basically, Mojolicious::Lite just adds some sugar to make accessing the API easier. For example, in a regular Mojo app, one might write `my $foo = $app->routes->under('/foo')->to('foo#baz');` (which would call the `sub baz` in `AppClass::Controller::Foo` as the handler), while ::Lite just has the `under` helper to make that easier: it just calls the `sub` that you pass to it, and it is automatically applied to any following routes (or routes in the same `group`), whereas in the previous example one has to use `$foo` to define routes that are affected by the `under`.	[reply] [d/l] [select]