Re^2: Amicable divorce

I agree mostly.

Given the planned timeline of Perl 7, it's unlikely to be more than other default pragmas.

And Perl 5 will still stick around as backup.

People are actually mostly discussing a future Perl 8

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)

Wikisyntax for the Monastery}

Comment on Re^2: Amicable divorce

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Amicable divorce by stevieb (Canon) on Jul 06, 2020 at 16:46 UTC
I think this whole numbering thing is ridiculous nonsense. We just got over the whole Perl6 fiasco that lasted nearly two decades, and now we're right back where we started. Just rename it to Purl, and start back at version 1.0.	[reply]
Re^4: Amicable divorce by LanX (Saint) on Jul 06, 2020 at 19:00 UTC
I think 7 is an overdue signal that Perl is alive and that development continuous. I could tell you plenty of stories from people insisting that development froze because of 6. They don't believe me when I say that 5.30 was released. I even see the current controversies positive because they seem to break the lethargy. I agree with your mother tho that it might already be 10 years too late . Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply]
Re^5: Amicable divorce by ribasushi (Pilgrim) on Jul 12, 2020 at 01:59 UTC
> I think 7 is an overdue signal that Perl is alive and that development continuous. If this is indeed the signal we are sending (I don't think so), but if we do: we are misleading the public. We should stop that.	[reply]
Re^6: Amicable divorce by LanX (Saint) on Jul 12, 2020 at 13:42 UTC
Re^7: Amicable divorce by ribasushi (Pilgrim) on Jul 12, 2020 at 15:04 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here