Re^11: Is there a problem with using barewords as filehandles ?

Well we wouldn't need any other languages if programmers were educated enough to use assembler.

It's a matter of productivity as well.

Comment on Re^11: Is there a problem with using barewords as filehandles ?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^12: Is there a problem with using barewords as filehandles ? by LanX (Saint) on Jul 08, 2020 at 14:30 UTC
> It's a matter of productivity as well That's what I tried to imply. :) BTW: You can be extremely productive in assembler with the right set of macros, but those macro sets finally evolve to a language like C. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply]
Re^13: Is there a problem with using barewords as filehandles ? by bliako (Abbot) on Jul 09, 2020 at 06:46 UTC
yes sorry, I missed the part about technique.	[reply]