Re^2: Is there a problem with using barewords as filehandles ?

When (if) bareword filehandles are disallowed, will we still be able to do: print STDERR 'ok';

If bareword::filehandles is anything to go by, then STDIN, STDOUT, STDERR, ARGV, ARGVOUT, and DATA would still be allowed.

Comment on Re^2: Is there a problem with using barewords as filehandles ? Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Is there a problem with using barewords as filehandles ? by syphilis (Archbishop) on Jul 19, 2020 at 01:01 UTC
If bareword::filehandles is anything to go by .... Aaah, yes - I'll take my cues from bareword::filehandles. Seems likely (even if not actually guaranteed) that this would be something we "can go by". So far, so good - the changes I've made are working ok under `use bareword::filehandles;` Thanks haukex. Cheers, Rob	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: Is there a problem with using barewords as filehandles ? by haukex (Archbishop) on Jul 19, 2020 at 07:38 UTC
Seems likely (even if not actually guaranteed) that this would be something we "can go by". True, and BTW, another very good hint that they will stay is that the same filehandles are also listed in the new standard.pm.	[reply]