in reply to Re^6: Inverting test conditions in Test::More ?
in thread Inverting test conditions in Test::More ?

I can't tell which other test besides is_deeply doesn't provide a negation.

From Test::More I would offer:

none of which have a negative. Technically ok doesn't have a negative either but the trivial workaround of negating the argument should be sufficient for that one.

🦛

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^8: Inverting test conditions in Test::More ?
by LanX (Saint) on Jul 24, 2020 at 14:30 UTC
    > none of which have a negative.

    Thanks! :)

    > From Test::More I would offer:

    May I add, from Test::More alone!

    There are so many more Test:: modules out there probably not as well designed as Test::More.

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
    Wikisyntax for the Monastery

[reply]
[d/l]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom