Re^7: Shouldn't references be readonly?

in reply to Re^6: Shouldn't references be readonly?
in thread Shouldn't LITERAL references be readonly? (updated)

ENOCONTEXT

I have no idea about which aliases you are talking here, and how aliases refer to my text.

But anyway: I've read your replies to other articles and got the impression that this is just for the fun of debate - I'm leaving this thread now.

Comment on Re^7: Shouldn't references be readonly?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^8: Shouldn't references be readonly? by LanX (Saint) on Aug 05, 2020 at 18:57 UTC
> I have no idea about which aliases you are talking here, In the OP in lines 25 -34 `$_` is an alias. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply] [d/l]
Re^8: Shouldn't references be readonly? by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Aug 08, 2020 at 08:28 UTC
«...just for the fun of debate...» I’ve read this thread (and others) over and over again and jumped to the conclusion that this stuff is his obsession. It’s all so «Jesuitisch raffiniert» according to Herbert Wehner. Best regards, KGB «The Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostrophe» `perl -MCrypt::CBC -E 'say Crypt::CBC->new(-key=>'kgb',-cipher=>"Blowfish")->decrypt_hex($ENV{KARL});'`Help	[reply] [d/l]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom