in reply to Re^11: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated)
in thread Shouldn't LITERAL references be readonly? (updated)

noice.

There are only dev releases of the module. If this is something you (the reader) is interested in, perhaps you could contact the author to encourage a proper release or assist with it.

  • Comment on Re^12: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^13:Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated)
by LanX (Saint) on Aug 11, 2020 at 15:13 UTC