That only makes sense if one presumes that it doesn't affect gays (or others on the spectrum), or if you think I presume that. Obviously, that's false. It does benefit them, and not just intangibles like validation (which includes representation on the census!); they get tax benefits, insurance benefits, etc. (Upd to added this paragraph.)

We were talking about removal.

Same-sex marriages are legal here in Canada. I was also going under the assumption that it's the same in the US (though now I wonder if it's only some states). There's no such thing as same-sex marriages; the are just marriages between two people.

Same for the module on CPAN. It's already on CPAN.

As such, I was speaking about caring about their removal (attaching importance to their removal, looking after or providing for the needs of their removal). Sorry about the confusion.

And no, I didn't assume "you" was straight. Straight or not, you have no reason to want it removed.

> Straight or not, you have no reason to want it removed.

I never complained about your post, I defended you.

You seem to confuse me with someone else.

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery}

I'm using the same "you" (meaning the reader) as in the original, not LanX specifically :)