Re^2: variable access

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: variable access by AnomalousMonk (Archbishop) on Jan 06, 2015 at 17:52 UTC
I used "return" ... But how did you use return? Are you saying that adding the statement `return $tura;` after the debug print statement that showed you that `$tura` was something you expected and then assigning the returned value to another lexical `my $other_lexical = tura();` passed nothing back from the subroutine? This seems doubtful... Give a man a fish: `<%-(-(-(-<`	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: variable access by Anonymous Monk on Jan 06, 2015 at 20:02 UTC
passed nothing back from the subroutine? This seems doubtful... You don't return from a callback :) unless the caller expects you to return ... Tk usually doesn't expect return values from callbacks ... op either needs to stuff $tura into a widget, or another object, which is done by giving it the object/widget as reference, or making the object/widget a global this means `sub tura { ... $globals{tura} = $tura; ... -browsecmd => [ \&tura, \%globals ], ... sub tura { ... my( $globals_ref ) = @_; $globals_ref->{tura} = $tura; + ... -browsecmd => [ \&tura, \$original_tura ], ... sub tura { ... my( $tura_ref ) = @_; $$tura_ref = $tura;` [download]	[reply] [d/l]
Re^5: variable access by AnomalousMonk (Archbishop) on Jan 07, 2015 at 00:18 UTC
`-browsecmd=>\&tura` Ah! I missed the fact that `tura()` was a callback. Nevermind... Give a man a fish: `<%-(-(-(-<`	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: variable access by aioan1 (Acolyte) on Jan 06, 2015 at 22:35 UTC
Thank you for trying to help me, in about 8 hours I'll use your indications and let you know if it will be ok.	[reply]