Reaped: Re^2: Autovivification with require

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Autovivification with require by eyepopslikeamosquito (Archbishop) on Nov 21, 2020 at 01:40 UTC
SunnyD, I've just used up all my dog-votes for today, downvoting every one of your nine consecutive nodes of utter bilge (node-ids: 11123927-11123935). You are a pest, like a mosquito in the dark, an unswatable irritation.	[reply]
Re^3: Autovivification with require by Bod (Parson) on Nov 20, 2020 at 21:58 UTC
"PHP-style require" is undoubtedly evil, but in an existing production application you often can't get rid of them. Are you suggesting that there is something inherently wrong with using `require` to bring in a lump of code?	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: Autovivification with require by jo37 (Curate) on Nov 20, 2020 at 22:13 UTC
Not every Anonymous Monk is really anonymous. Don't waste your time. Greetings, -jo `$gryYup$d0ylprbpriprrYpkJl2xyl~rzg??P~5lp2hyl0p$`	[reply]