in reply to Re^9: Pointers and References
in thread Pointers and References
So $x = 42 is as useful as 1 = 42
I don't understand this statement. I can see where an expression like $x = 42 might be useful, but 1 = 42 can't possibly be useful because it won't compile.
Update: Or do you mean "if $x is aliased to a literal value (e.g., 1), $x = 42 is equivalent to 1 = 42"? (Update: And specifically WRT to the for-loop here? I didn't look back far enough. :)
Give a man a fish: <%-{-{-{-<
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^11: Pointers and References (updated)
by LanX (Saint) on Nov 25, 2020 at 21:21 UTC |