in reply to fastcgi without the module

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: fastcgi without the module
by eyepopslikeamosquito (Archbishop) on Dec 02, 2020 at 05:22 UTC
      > there is a 99.42 probability that this reply is yet another "anonymous" post from PM's chronic pest

      Kind of reverse Turing test:

      Someone trying to pass as "AI" bot ... ;-)

      Cheers Rolf
      (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
      Wikisyntax for the Monastery

    A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.