in reply to Re^4: Bidirectional lookup algorithm? (sundialsvc4 spam)
in thread Bidirectional lookup algorithm? (Updated: further info.)

... This explains the quality of your posts...

There is no post by this certified asshole that has something like quality (the non-inferiority or superiority of something).

I'm really disconsolate that i got no more votes tonight. Tomorrow i'll up vote your reply ASAP.

And i will continue to recommend down voting anything posted by this monk without distinction as a good default policy.

Update: See also Assholes: A Theory.

Best regards, Karl

«The Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostrophe»

  • Comment on Re^5: Bidirectional lookup algorithm? (sundialsvc4 spam)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Bidirectional lookup algorithm? (sundialsvc4 spam)
by marto (Cardinal) on Jan 08, 2015 at 11:09 UTC

    Yesterday shortly after posting I made an update, not removing what I said, rather adding to it, explaining my position as I'd clearly become exasperated and should not have responded in this manner. In future I'll stick to the factual rather than farcical, and (FWIW) urge others to consider doing the same.

    Update: fixed typo.

[reply]

      Thank you marto for clarifying. Sure, it is true that i lost countenance a bit.

      And i'm d'accord with you that concentrating on the basic theme ;-) of PM is a good thing.

      But i don't regret anything i wrote.

      Best regards, Karl

      «The Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostrophe»

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom