Re^4: Templating system choice

I went down the HTML::Template path. It's much lighter weight than TT, quicker to learn and with enough built in smarts to get stuff done without needing to embed code.

Optimising for fewest key strokes only makes sense transmitting to Pluto or beyond

Comment on Re^4: Templating system choice

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Templating system choice by LanX (Saint) on Dec 23, 2020 at 00:11 UTC
> I went down the HTML::Template path. Then you might be interested in Tinita's HTML::Template::Compiled. IIRC it benchmarked best a decade ago. Not sure if it ever was compared to Xslate. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply]
Re^5: Templating system choice by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Dec 21, 2020 at 20:22 UTC
It’s also much closer to a pure View and as such a good choice for maintenance. The only advantage Xslate has there is speed; it’s in C and additionally optimized to cached templates.	[reply]
Re^6: Templating system choice by Bod (Parson) on Dec 22, 2020 at 17:15 UTC
Xslate has there is speed; it’s in C and additionally optimized to cached templates. Well that excludes that option from the choice...complied modules cannot be readily installed on the shared hosting I'm using. I can ask support to install them which is a lottery on who picks up the ticket as to if and when it happens. So it's no for now. Maybe I shall look again when I have VPS or a dedicated server.	[reply]