in reply to Re^5: The Basques introduced us to object orientation?
in thread The Basques introduced us to object orientation?
The benefit of OOP was to introduce "actors" which translates grammatically to subjects to me. So it should have better be named SOP.
And this is not purely philosophical, because I'm struggling with people who design their class instances as data containers. (Remember this talk about "How Moose made me a bad OO programmer" ?)
Hence the difference between push @a,$b and a.push(b) (the latter being JS) is passive vs active.
The Perl form being "push into @a the $b" VOO
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
°) actually that's incorrectly merging two phases, the programmer is the subject giving orders in imperative form, the program is the subject executing those orders.
I'm starting to feel like a character from Tron ;)
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^7: The Basques introduced us to object orientation? (Update)
by betmatt (Scribe) on Jan 28, 2021 at 05:38 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Jan 28, 2021 at 15:00 UTC |