Re: Type::Tiny and anyOf, oneOf

Not exactly sure what you want to accomplish but "any of" sounds like a union:

use Types::Standard qw( ArrayRef HashRef ScalarRef );

my ( @thing1, %thing2, $thing3 );

my $union = ArrayRef | HashRef;

$union->check( \@thing1 );   # true
$union->check( \%thing1 );   # true
$union->check( \$thing1 );   # false

( ArrayRef | HashRef | ScalarRef )->check( \$thing1 );   # true
[download]

Hire me at Toby Ink Ltd or Join my OnlyFans

Comment on Re: Type::Tiny and anyOf, oneOf Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Type::Tiny and anyOf, oneOf by 1nickt (Canon) on Feb 03, 2021 at 00:04 UTC
Thanks Toby. It probably can't be accomplished with a type. With a JSON Schema you can say about an object (Dict) that it must contain one of a list of (named) keys each with their own type. You could require either a phone number or an email address, for example. So something like: `my $check = compile(Dict[ foo => Str, oneOf => [ baz => Int, qux => Str, ], ]);` [download] The way forward always starts with a minimal test.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: Type::Tiny and anyOf, oneOf by tobyink (Canon) on Feb 04, 2021 at 21:54 UTC
Something like this: `my $type = Dict->of( foo => Str, baz => Optional[Int], qux => Optional[Str], )->where(q{ exists $_->{baz} or exists $_->{qux} }); if ( $type->check( \%somehash ) ) { say "matched"; }` [download] Also, might be worth looking into JSON-Schema-AsType. Hire me at Toby Ink Ltd or Join my OnlyFans	[reply] [d/l]