in reply to
Re: perl + Qt, the easy way
in thread
perl + Qt, the easy way
Why not a Qt4 namespace and leave Qt as a defacto Qt3 namespace?
Comment on
Re^2: perl + Qt, the easy way
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: perl + Qt, the easy way
by
chrisburel
(Initiate)
on Jan 10, 2015 at 02:07 UTC
That would've been a good idea, if I had known that it was going to be a problem before I wrote the code. But it's been released since 2009, and changing the module namespace would break any existing PerlQt4 code out there.
[reply]
In Section
Meditations