in reply to Re^3: Brute force vs algorithm (PWC # 100)
in thread Brute force vs algorithm (PWC # 100)
Our approaches are not that different, your dynamic "cache" is just my explicit "weight" triangle.
And you are needing more resources for recursion and hash.
But you could improve it by adding bound criteria (i.e. no need to calculate a subtree if it has no chance to be better than the current minimum).
Though I'm not sure this will pay of, my algorithm is already O(m) with m #cells.
# PWC 100 use v5.12; use warnings; use JSON::PP; use Test::More; use List::Util qw/reduce min first/; use Data::Dump qw/pp dd/; # --------- Testing while ( my $line = <DATA> ) { chomp $line; my ($json, $exp_cost, $exp_path) = split /\s+/, $line; my $triangle = decode_json($json); $exp_path = decode_json($exp_path); my ($cost,$path) = compute($triangle); is( $cost, $exp_cost, "cost: $cost" ); is_deeply( $path, $exp_path , "path: ".pp $path); } # --- 100 rows element "1" my $depth = 100; my $pathological = [ map [ (1) x $_], 1..$depth ]; my ($cost,$path) = compute($pathological); is( $cost, $depth, "pathologigal cost: $cost" ); # --- 100 rows random elements my $random = [ map [ map {1+int rand 10} 1..$_ ], 1..$depth ]; ($cost,$path) = compute($random); say "random cost: $cost"; say "random path: ",pp $path; done_testing; # --------- Implementation sub compute { my @triangle = @{(shift)}; my @weight = map { [@$_] } @triangle; # deep copy for ( my $i = $#weight; $i > 0; $i--) { my $children = $weight[$i]; my $parents = $weight[$i-1]; my $j; reduce { # --- by overlapping pairs $parents->[$j++] += # add to parent ... min $a,$b; # ... minimal child $b # = next $a } @$children; } my $result = $weight[0][0]; my $path = calc_path(\@triangle,\@weight,$result); return ($result,$path); } sub calc_path { my ($triangle, $weight, $diff) = @_; my @path; for my $row (@$triangle) { my ($i,$sum) = each @$weight; my $j = -1; first { $j++; $diff == $_ } @$sum; my $step = $row->[$j]; push @path, $step; $diff -= $step; } return \@path; } __DATA__ [[1],[2,4],[6,4,9],[5,1,7,2]] 8 [1,2,4,1] [[9],[1,6],[7,8,2],[5,8,2,3]] 19 [9,6,2,2]
C:/Perl_524/bin\perl.exe -w d:/tmp/pm/pwc100.pl ok 1 - cost: 8 ok 2 - path: [1, 2, 4, 1] ok 3 - cost: 19 ok 4 - path: [9, 6, 2, 2] ok 5 - pathologigal cost: 100 random cost: 305 random path: [ 10, 3, 2, 6, 3, 5, 2, 2, 2, 1, 6, 1, 8, 3, 1, 6, 1, 3, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 1, 4, 3, 1, 7, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 5, 1, 6, 1, 6, 2, 1, 8, 5, 3, 1, 3, 2, 1, 2, 5, 3, 5, 1, 4, 8, 9, 6, 5, 1, 3, 4, 2, 3, 5, 7, 2, 3, 1, 3, 2, 1, 5, 5, 4, 4, 1, 2, 4, 2, 3, 1, 4, 2, 6, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 1, 1, 2, 2, 4, 2, 1, 2, 1, ] 1..5
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^5: Brute force vs algorithm (PWC # 100)
by tybalt89 (Monsignor) on Feb 16, 2021 at 04:39 UTC | |
by tybalt89 (Monsignor) on Feb 16, 2021 at 05:04 UTC |