Re^3: perlcritic and MCE::Loop

did you separate the arguments behind the block with a comma after introducing "sub"?

  DB<25> sub run (&@) { my $code =shift; $code->(@_) }

  DB<26> *mce_loop = \&run

  DB<27> mce_loop {print "code @_"} 1,2,3            # no comma needed
code 1 2 3
  DB<28> mce_loop sub {print "code @_"}, 1,2,3       # comma needed
code 1 2 3
  DB<29> mce_loop sub {print "code @_"} 1,2,3        # syntax error
Number found where operator expected at (eval 38) ...
[download]

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)

Wikisyntax for the Monastery}

Comment on Re^3: perlcritic and MCE::Loop Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: perlcritic and MCE::Loop by redtux (Sexton) on Feb 20, 2021 at 14:52 UTC
Thanks, I missed that, working now My previous "solution" didn't work, code ran but mce_loop did nothing. All seems to be working now and perlcritic happy	[reply]
Re^5: perlcritic and MCE::Loop by LanX (Saint) on Feb 20, 2021 at 21:02 UTC
> My previous "solution" didn't work, code ran but mce_loop did nothing. That's obvious. Defining an anonymous `sub` won't execute it but return the code-ref. `DB<39> p sub { print "run @_" } # returns ref CODE(0x2e80a90) DB<40> sub{ print "run @_" }->(1..3) # calls ref run 1 2 3 DB<41>` [download] Though I'm a bit surprised, my muscle memory wanted brackets around the ref for precedence: `( sub{ print "run @_" } )->(@_)` this could still be needed in other contexts. (or - more likely - it's just cargo cult from JS ;) Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: perlcritic and MCE::Loop by LanX (Saint) on Feb 20, 2021 at 15:56 UTC
> and perlcritic happy Still strange, there is a bug somewhere in this policy. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply]