in reply to Re^5: PadWalker's closed_over - but for our variables?
in thread PadWalker's closed_over - but for our variables?

> I'm not an expert on the theory and terminology, I'm an engineer and I care more about how things work ;-)

OK Wolowitz, but we can agree that wording matters in communication? ;-)

> B::Xref seems like a decent starting point

unfortunately it's buggy, I'd rather try to reverse "engineer" B::Deparse.

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery

  • Comment on Re^6: PadWalker's closed_over - but for our variables?

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom