Re^3: PadWalker's closed_over - but for our variables? (update: "declaration")

in reply to Re^2: PadWalker's closed_over - but for our variables? (update: "declaration")
in thread PadWalker's closed_over - but for our variables?

I totally agree what you point out on the update. ;) what I want to empasize is the declaration of our acatually means declaring a alias to a a pkg variable, not declare a package variable itself.

I am trying to improve my English skills, if you see a mistake please feel free to reply or /msg me a correction

Comment on Re^3: PadWalker's closed_over - but for our variables? (update: "declaration")

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: PadWalker's closed_over - but for our variables? (update: "declaration") by LanX (Saint) on Apr 05, 2021 at 13:48 UTC
> declare a package variable itself. please explain what that is supposed to mean. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom