in reply to Re^8: PadWalker's closed_over - but for our variables?
in thread PadWalker's closed_over - but for our variables?

> Don't do that by by reinventing what global means

I didn't, I cited perlglossary which was written by Larry.

> $_ and similar have been called superglobals.

never heard the term superglobal, any reference?

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery

  • Comment on Re^9: PadWalker's closed_over - but for our variables?

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom