in reply to Re^8: PadWalker's closed_over - but for our variables?
in thread PadWalker's closed_over - but for our variables?
> No. Maybe imprecise since there two kinds of lexically-scoped variables, but not messed up.
perlglossary is explicit that our-vars are not "lexicals".
https://perldoc.perl.org/perlglossary#lexical-variable
A variable subject to lexical scoping, declared by my. Often just called a “lexical”. (The our declaration declares a lexically scoped name for a global variable, which is not itself a lexical variable.)
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
|
|---|