in reply to Re: Validate XML with schemas specified inline (xsi:schemaLocation) (with libxml or anything different from Xerces)
in thread Validate XML with schemas specified inline (xsi:schemaLocation) (with libxml or anything different from Xerces)

This is a useful info thanks. And it makes sense then. I'm absolutely not an expert for the *pan world (i.e. its rules&conventions), just a sporadic user who goes to browse if a kind of class is out there or not. Consider then my point as quite newbie rubbish. Nevertheless it's useful to *pan users like me an exported keep-alive that the class is indeed up-to-date. I'm thinking (just to give an idea), of bots similar to what in GitHub, which open a PR for you when a dependency is changed. You just bump your code version number to reflect that all is up-to-date. Users of the code know immediately that there is no aged dust on that class. Thanks again for your info.
  • Comment on Re^2: Validate XML with schemas specified inline (xsi:schemaLocation) (with libxml or anything different from Xerces)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Validate XML with schemas specified inline (xsi:schemaLocation) (with libxml or anything different from Xerces)
by Anonymous Monk on Apr 23, 2021 at 12:19 UTC
    unfortunately, you'd be better off ignoring the comment from that particular Anonymous Monk. he's well known around here as an ignorant blowhard. sorry for the inconvenience.