in reply to Re^3: Doubley surprised by fat commas
in thread Doubley surprised by fat commas

OP is a curious case of surprise. C++ wouldn't allow the syntax. C++ thinking rust? :)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Doubley surprised by fat commas
by GrandFather (Saint) on Jun 10, 2021 at 21:23 UTC

    My surprise had nothing to do with C++ thinking (or even Rusty thinking). Like Parv I was expecting undef since it's been a long time since I've been bitten in that way by Perl's trailing comma in a list implications.

    Optimising for fewest key strokes only makes sense transmitting to Pluto or beyond