in reply to Re^2: Module::ScanDeps interaction with Moose::
in thread Module::ScanDeps interaction with Moose::

Ok, now you got something for rt://Module-ScanDeps :)

What happens when you try packing without -c or -x options, with just the static list?

  • Comment on Re^3: Module::ScanDeps interaction with Moose::

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Module::ScanDeps interaction with Moose::
by xlr82xs (Acolyte) on Jan 16, 2015 at 03:25 UTC

    As above (I may have edited it after I saw your reply) if packed with static module detection, it misses the List::MoreUtils::PP module and thus fails to execute. If List::MoreUtils::PP is manually specified the code functions. However, I feel that with execution or compilation it would actually detect List::MoreUtils::PP and not require it to be manually included.

    If I could get BitCard to actually let me log in correctly, I would certainly post a bug report.

      you can email to send bug report if you can't login bug-Module-ScanDeps {{theAtCharThatGoesHere}} rt.cpan.org
      What happens if you add use List::MoreUtils::XS; ?

        I didn't think to try that actually.

        Adding "use List::MoreUtils::XS;" still results in the "Can't locate List/MoreUtils/PP.pm" failure on execution of the packed file.

        Adding "use List::MoreUtils::PP;" instead results in successful running.