Re^4: Perl Foundation Community Affairs Team Transparency Report

He complained about a Raku contributor who had used racist language in commit messages and documentation.

Which Raku contributor ?
What was the racist language ?

You can find the offending language if you follow links to the Git repos cited in the thread by SRI

Could you please provide those links ? (I don't know where to find them.)

If people aren't prepared to provide explicit information then I would suggest that they post to places like twitter and facebook - which are specifically designed to cater for innuendo and bullshit.
But please don't pollute perlmonks with such rubbish.

Cheers,
Rob

Comment on Re^4: Perl Foundation Community Affairs Team Transparency Report

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Perl Foundation Community Affairs Team Transparency Report by marto (Cardinal) on Jun 26, 2021 at 12:40 UTC
"Could you please provide those links ? (I don't know where to find them.)" The links begin on the second 'message' in that URL you posted.	[reply]
Re^5: Perl Foundation Community Affairs Team Transparency Report by marto (Cardinal) on Jun 26, 2021 at 15:40 UTC
"If people aren't prepared to provide explicit information then I would suggest that they post to places like twitter and facebook - which are specifically designed to cater for innuendo and bullshit" But please don't pollute perlmonks with such rubbish. ' For what it's worth 1nickt commented on a post you made (including a link to twitter content, see your statement) which provides links to the evidence you seek. I didn't downvote but feel the criticism of 1nickt is unjust.	[reply]
Re^5: Perl Foundation Community Affairs Team Transparency Report by Anonymous Monk on Jun 26, 2021 at 15:10 UTC
I also couldn't see it for a while (so this commit adds `master` as a default branch...), but then I looked at the commit message instead of the content. That's unambiguously racist language.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^6: Perl Foundation Community Affairs Team Transparency Report by marto (Cardinal) on Jun 26, 2021 at 15:21 UTC
In the archive.org link, it's right there in bold, you are right unambiguously racist and incredibly offensive.	[reply]