in reply to Re^4: conditional catch-blocks 'try {} catch(COND) { }'
in thread conditional catch-blocks 'try {} catch(COND) { }'

So you're offended by having it pointed out that you may be reinventing a wheel, or that you didn't do your research, or you didn't tell us about the research you did? Ok.
  • Comment on Re^5: conditional catch-blocks 'try {} catch(COND) { }'

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: conditional catch-blocks 'try {} catch(COND) { }'
by LanX (Saint) on Sep 20, 2021 at 15:16 UTC
    > So you're offended

    Nope!

    So what's your contribution now?

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
    Wikisyntax for the Monastery

[reply]
      I already made it, too bad you ignored it completely just because I happen to be posting anonymously.
[reply]
        @my dear downvoters!

        Searching for "try" on CPAN is showing a plenitude of modules, which demonstrates the contrast between demand and complexity of the problem.

        Just reproducing a handful of (quote)

        > "a million others"

        without addressing the problems is no contribution, it's just lazy polemics.

        It's no better than an illiterate saying RTFM ...

        Cheers Rolf
        (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
        Wikisyntax for the Monastery

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom