Re^2: Queuing in multithread context

Please ignore this. I had a brain fart! ~~Please don't advocate Thread::Queue. Its broken.~~

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I'm with torvalds on this

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Agile (and TDD) debunked

Comment on Re^2: Queuing in multithread context

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Queuing in multithread context by Anonymous Monk on Jan 20, 2015 at 11:23 UTC
Please don't advocate Thread::Queue. Its broken. Why? I learned to advocate it from your postings :)	[reply]
Re^4: Queuing in multithread context by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 20, 2015 at 11:30 UTC
Sorry. I brain-farted. I've scratched my post above. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I'm with torvalds on this In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Agile (and TDD) debunked	[reply]