in reply to Re: Truncation of individual "Nodes to Consider"
in thread Truncation of individual "Nodes to Consider"

G'day cavac,

I don't have access to PM code, so I can't comment on how easy or difficult this might be. I did suggest reusing code that I thought was already in place; although, that was just a guess.

I don't know if your comment about "... the more annoying a post in NTC is ..." is truly valid. Those long posts hung around for quite some time: they're gone now (but it is more than a month later).

Anyway, thanks for giving this some thought and responding.

— Ken

  • Comment on Re^2: Truncation of individual "Nodes to Consider"

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Truncation of individual "Nodes to Consider"
by LanX (Saint) on Dec 02, 2021 at 12:04 UTC
    > I did suggest reusing code that I thought was already in place;

    Last time I checked posts were rejected not truncated if longer than x kb (x~~64 ?).

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
    Wikisyntax for the Monastery

[reply]
      update
      hmm ... I just tested posting a file with 67.584 bytes, and surprisingly it went thru ...

      old

      perl -E"say 'x' x 2**6 for 1..2**10"

      next try 2**17

      next try 2**18

      <Reveal this spoiler or all in this thread>

[reply]
[d/l]
[select]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion