in reply to can i still use Win32::OLE with active Perl 64 bit?
the company only allows active Perl 5.12.00
So your company IT prefers to use a Perl version with known security problems (including remote code execution and stuff) because they don't want to risk that someone possibly, maybe, on the-off-chance of the moonphase being wrong, having to go in and fix a couple of bugs in old scripts?
I think your company IT is facing a classic XY problem. They are asking "Upgrading Perl *may* result in some additional work, so keeping the old version is the best option we have. What do we have to do to keep this old version running?", when really, the question should be (in my opinion): "What do we have to do to make sure we have the latest security updates".
Just in case, send them the link to the CVE database for Perl in writing. You don't want to be the one who gets the blame if the fit hits the shan, so to speak:
https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-1885/Perl.html.
Maybe also clarify that there are quite a few nasty things that have since been fixed. For example:
Depending on what you are using Win32::OLE for, an attacker could basically create an Excel/Word/Powerpoint file that makes your Perl scripts execute arbitrary code like encrypting your data and then asking for some Bitcoins...
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: Can I still use Win32::OLE with active Perl 64 bit?
by davies (Monsignor) on Feb 04, 2022 at 16:14 UTC | |
|
Re^2: can i still use Win32::OLE with active Perl 64 bit?
by perlynewby (Scribe) on Feb 10, 2022 at 00:25 UTC |