in reply to Re: Calling an overload::Method
in thread Calling an overload::Method
I didn't try that - if it works, then yes I guess that's an option. It is possible that it will limit portability, since varargs stuff has traditionally been tricky in that regard - but since you're not actually looking at the additional arguments (ie not calling va_start), maybe that won't be a problem.
I've no idea what C that will translate to: I'm curious how it will decide to invoke the typemaps, since you have not declared what type the additional arguments are. In principle that might even make it slightly faster.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: Calling an overload::Method
by etj (Priest) on Mar 24, 2022 at 15:13 UTC |