in reply to Re^2: Capture a non-printable char and test what it is
in thread Capture a non-printable char and test what it is

Where do you find that?

kcott is right that I simply looked at the code's output, but it's also documented in Quote and Quote like Operators.

If I look at the ascii table I see that the escape key can be represented as: 27 (decimal), 1B (hexadecimal), 033 (octal).

Those work too: the string "\e" is the same as "\x1B" and "\033" - you can try this out yourself with eq.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Capture a non-printable char and test what it is
by almsdealer (Acolyte) on May 22, 2022 at 17:15 UTC

    Thank you, that link to quote-like characters is very useful. I think one mistake I made was trying to test if the char was the hex value of the escape key using single quotes.

      In the time-honoured tradition of TMTOWTDI, if you replace

      if ( $key eq "\e" ) { print "Escape pressed\n"; }

      with

      if ( $key eq "\e" && $key eq "\x1b" && $key eq "\033" && $key eq "\c[" && $key eq "\x{1b}" && $key eq "\o{33}" && $key eq "\N{ESCAPE}" && $key eq "\N{U+001B}" && $key eq v27 && ord($key) == 27 && ord($key) == 0x1b && ord($key) == 033 && ord($key) == 0o33 && ord($key) == 0b11011 ) { print "Escape pressed\n"; }

      you'll get the same result.

      I don't claim that's a non-exhaustive list of all possibilities, but I think it's pretty close.

      You can find references to all of those in one or more of: perlop; perldata; perlrebackslash.

      — Ken

        if ( $key eq "\e" && $key eq "\x1b" && $key eq "\033" && $key eq "\c[" && $key eq "\x{1b}" && $key eq "\o{33}" && $key eq "\N{ESCAPE}" && $key eq "\N{U+001B}" && $key eq v27 && ord($key) == 27 && ord($key) == 0x1b && ord($key) == 033 && ord($key) == 0o33 && ord($key) == 0b11011 ) { print "Escape pressed\n"; }

        I wonder how much of it remains after parsing and optimizing:

        #!perl use strict; use warnings; use charnames qw( :full ); for my $key ("r", "x", "\e", "z") { if ( $key eq "\e" && $key eq "\x1b" && $key eq "\033" && $key eq "\c[" && $key eq "\x{1b}" && $key eq "\o{33}" && $key eq "\N{ESCAPE}" && $key eq "\N{U+001B}" && $key eq v27 && ord($key) == 27 && ord($key) == 0x1b && ord($key) == 033 # that's not perl: && ord($key) == 0o33 && ord($key) == 0b11011 ) { print "Escape pressed\n"; } }
        X:\>perl -MO=Deparse 11144112.pl use charnames (':full'); use warnings; use strict 'refs'; BEGIN { $^H{'charnames_inverse_ords'} = q(HASH(0x2a62c30)); $^H{'charnames_stringified_inverse_ords'} = q(); $^H{'charnames'} = q(CODE(0x2b77d90)); $^H{'charnames_full'} = q(1); $^H{'charnames_scripts'} = q(); $^H{'charnames_name_aliases'} = q(HASH(0x2a62c18)); $^H{'charnames_ord_aliases'} = q(HASH(0x2a62c90)); $^H{'charnames_short'} = q(0); $^H{'charnames_stringified_names'} = q(); $^H{'charnames_stringified_ords'} = q(); } foreach my $key ('r', 'x', "\e", 'z') { if ($key eq "\e" and $key eq "\e" and $key eq "\e" and $key eq "\e +" and $key eq "\e" and $key eq "\e" and $key eq "\e" and $key eq "\e" + and $key eq v27 and ord $key == 27 and ord $key == 27 and ord $key = += 27 and ord $key == 27) { print "Escape pressed\n"; } } 11144112.pl syntax OK X:\>perl -v This is perl 5, version 14, subversion 2 (v5.14.2) built for MSWin32-x +64-multi-thread Copyright 1987-2011, Larry Wall Perl may be copied only under the terms of either the Artistic License + or the GNU General Public License, which may be found in the Perl 5 source ki +t. Complete documentation for Perl, including FAQ lists, should be found +on this system using "man perl" or "perldoc perl". If you have access to + the Internet, point your browser at http://www.perl.org/, the Perl Home Pa +ge. X:\>

        So, clearly all variants of writing "\e" and 27 were unified, but I kind of expected that the optimizer would eliminate repeated identical expressions. Like this:

        if ($key eq "\e" and $key eq v27 and ord $key == 27) { print "Escape pressed\n"; }

        Alexander

        --
        Today I will gladly share my knowledge and experience, for there are no sweeter words than "I told you so". ;-)