in reply to Re: qq? with regards to Regexp::Grammars
in thread qq? with regards to Regexp::Grammars

You're so very right --- I thought it was one of Conway's cryptic "notations" that I wasn't able to find!

<Thanks

  • Comment on Re^2: qq? with regards to Regexp::Grammars

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: qq? with regards to Regexp::Grammars
by perlfan (Parson) on Jul 04, 2022 at 21:30 UTC
    Pointing this out might also help. 
      <token: delim>  [[:punct:]]++

    [download]
[reply]
[d/l]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom