Re^2: Should my project be uploaded to CPAN as a module or an Application? (FIX PACKAGE NAMES FIRST)

in reply to Re: Should my project be uploaded to CPAN as a module or an Application? (FIX PACKAGE NAMES FIRST)
in thread Should my project be uploaded to CPAN as a module or an Application?

Thanks etj

For example, would the following solution keep a lower-cased package at its corresponding low level?

package App::SeismicUnix::geopsy::dinver;

Comment on Re^2: Should my project be uploaded to CPAN as a module or an Application? (FIX PACKAGE NAMES FIRST) Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Should my project be uploaded to CPAN as a module or an Application? (FIX PACKAGE NAMES FIRST) by etj (Priest) on Jul 16, 2022 at 23:33 UTC
That would be a very idiomatic and good solution. Zooming out a bit - I happened to notice that you have another repo which looks like the actual place where the real code lives. Is there a reason not to add the extra CPAN-able stuff to it rather than have this separate repo?	[reply]
Re^3: Should my project be uploaded to CPAN as a module or an Application? (FIX PACKAGE NAMES FIRST) by gllore (Acolyte) on Jul 16, 2022 at 16:32 UTC
Thanks again for that last note Yes, many fine examples already exist in the CPAN e.g., PDL itself	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom