Re^9: Notification of XP increase has gone wild (updated)

> very time you tweak the system to close down another possible route of abuse, the collective impact on non-abusers is far greater than that on abusers.

In general yes, in this case no.

It's pretty easy to decide.

The gods could do a SQL query to see how big the percentage of monks is with high proportion of archive votes.

I bet this will mainly show two° groups,

potential abusers who practically never post,
prolific members who don't care if they loose the gratification factor after let's say x=40 archive votes per week (or 160 per 4 weeks).

Just ask someone like eyepops - an outspoken "archiver" - if he would care ... :)

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the 𐍀𐌴𐍂𐌻 Programming Language :)

Wikisyntax for the Monastery}

°) well three, I forgot about choroba ;-P

Comment on Re^9: Notification of XP increase has gone wild (updated)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^10: Notification of XP increase has gone wild (maybe) by eyepopslikeamosquito (Archbishop) on Oct 26, 2022 at 12:43 UTC
Just ask someone like eyepops - an outspoken "archiver" - if he would care ... :) I wouldn't care ... might even enjoy it, even if I lost XP (as sometimes happened in the good old days when casting too many dog-votes against you-know-who :). Generally, I agree with the approach being advocated by LanX in this long thread.	[reply]