Re^2: can u suggest a regex for this ?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: can u suggest a regex for this ? by jo37 (Curate) on Feb 03, 2023 at 15:43 UTC
Without `/r`, `map` would modify the original array, but this is not available in very old versions. Greetings, -jo `$gryYup$d0ylprbpriprrYpkJl2xyl~rzg??P~5lp2hyl0p$`	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: can u suggest a regex for this ? by kcott (Archbishop) on Feb 03, 2023 at 17:04 UTC
"I'm on Perl 5.8.8 maybe /r isn't supported?" The `/r` modifier was introduced in Perl `v5.14.0` (see "perl5140delta: Non-destructive substitution"). Perl `v5.14.0` was released 12 years ago (see perlhist). — Ken	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: can u suggest a regex for this ? by hippo (Archbishop) on Feb 03, 2023 at 15:54 UTC
I'm on Perl 5.8.8 There have been recent discussions here about using old Perls. If it's not too impertinent to ask, would you mind divulging which O/S (and which version) you are running which has this Perl version installed? I'm unaware of any O/S still supported which has it. TYVM. 🦛	[reply]
Re^4: can u suggest a regex for this ? by misterperl (Friar) on Feb 03, 2023 at 16:24 UTC
I thought I'd replied to this but I don't see it. Sadly we're on RH5.5 . Our company is VERY change-averse. Like NASA using Apollo components..	[reply]
Re^5: can u suggest a regex for this ? by hippo (Archbishop) on Feb 03, 2023 at 17:10 UTC
Thanks for replying and for your honesty. And while I do understand and sympathise with the change-averse mindset there comes a point beyond which not changing becomes more risky than changing. Good luck with persuading TPTB of this. Update: added abbr title to TPTB, given the ensuing discussion. Should have done it in the first place. Mea culpa. 🦛	[reply]
Re^6: can u suggest a regex for this ? by xiaoyafeng (Deacon) on Feb 05, 2023 at 09:03 UTC
Re^7: can u suggest a regex for this ? by tybalt89 (Monsignor) on Feb 05, 2023 at 09:19 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here
Re^5: can u suggest a regex for this ? by Fletch (Bishop) on Feb 03, 2023 at 16:31 UTC
RHEL5 went EOL just shy of 6 years ago, and extended support ended three years ago. You must not have any sort of public / outside audit looking into things because that's crufty enough that it would more than likely be called out in such. The cake is a lie. The cake is a lie. The cake is a lie.	[reply]
Re^5: can u suggest a regex for this ? by marto (Cardinal) on Feb 04, 2023 at 14:47 UTC
I work in a very change/risk averse industry, however an unsupported OS is a huge red flag for us.	[reply]