in reply to Re^3: I prefer not to run the latest version of Perl because:
in thread I prefer not to run the latest version of Perl because:

I'm curious as to what features of the proprietary perl2exe you need, and wonder if they're not covered by the alternatives.

  • Comment on Re^4: I prefer not to run the latest version of Perl because:

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: I prefer not to run the latest version of Perl because:
by roho (Bishop) on Feb 06, 2023 at 00:32 UTC
    I’ve tried “pp” and it did not produce a working executable. I use a number of Tk modules and other assorted modules and it became increasingly frustrating trying to mail down the culprit. “perl2exe” pretty much just works right out of the box, which leaves me free to concentrate on the programming projects at hand.

    "It's not how hard you work, it's how much you get done."

[reply]

      If you haven't tried it already, and have feel like revisiting the pp method pp_simple may be of interest.

[reply]
        Thanks for the suggestion, but pp_simple does not exist on my machine. The "pp" utility exists as "C:\Strawberry\perl\site\bin\pp.bat", but there is no pp_simple. I am running Strawberry Perl 5.24.1 on Windows 10. Is pp_simple part of Strawberry Perl, and if so where is it located?

        "It's not how hard you work, it's how much you get done."

[reply]

In Section Past Polls