in reply to plack psgi

> I'm trying to avoid frameworks like Dancer/Mojolicious

Mojolicious is very lightweight and flexible. Not sure why you want to reinvent the wheel.

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the 𐍀𐌴𐍂𐌻 Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: plack psgi vs mojolicious
by Anonymous Monk on Feb 09, 2023 at 16:49 UTC
[reply]

      > Didn't Mojolicious reinvent every known wheel to avoid CPAN dependencies? ☺

      That's the point, the OP doesn't need to reinvent what SRI already packaged into mojo...

      Cheers Rolf
      (addicted to the 𐍀𐌴𐍂𐌻 Programming Language :)
      Wikisyntax for the Monastery

[reply]
      yes, looks more and more like the way to go...I might just do that.
[reply]

        Mojolicious::Lite is absolutely superb for rapidly developing single-file CGI scripts / persistent webapps with embedded templates. With no CPAN dependencies it should definitely be a Perl core module, for the same reason CGI was core for 18 years. Web is still the killer app!

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom